Home › Governance, Risk & Compliance › Case Study: CME Moves to Risk Based Compliance Part 2

Case Study: CME Moves to Risk Based Compliance Part 2

GRC Case Study: CME Moves to Risk Based Compliance (part 2 of 3)

Hear how the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) advanced with a leading GRC Program when John Verburgt, CME’s Director of Compliance, joins GRC editor and expert Eric Krell to present a case study detailing the best practices that allowed CME to derive strategic benefits from its GRC strategy.

Plus, an in-depth 2009 Study of GRC Best Practices is available free to all registrants.

Unlike any time in the history of their companies, finance executives are today confronting major risk events that can quickly reverse the fortunes of long term successful companies. Leading edge GRC Best Practices are today helping companies address and avoid such events, but how can finance executives determine whether their approach to GRC is up to meeting the challenge? Let our 2009 Study of GRC Best Practices reveal how.

Go to GRC Case Study Podcast Part 1
Go to GRC Case Study Podcast Part 3

No votes yet

Businesses often have

On April 4th, 2012 jaffa (not verified) said:

Businesses often have important intellectual property that needs protection from competitors for the company to stay profitable. This could require patents, copyrights, trademarks or preservation of trade secrets. Most businesses have names, logos and similar branding techniques that could benefit from trademarking. Thanks for sharing.
Regards,
phone number lookup

I have to agree with the

On February 22nd, 2012 ways of making money (not verified) said:

I have to agree with the fact that finance CEOs are facing real risks today when making certain decisions. As others have said already, we need a reform for the global market. Things won't work anymore if we don't do something to change the current trends.

Beautiful article

On February 17th, 2012 How to Save Money Fast (not verified) said:

Any start-up idea will have enough risk to fill a dozen business plans. No investor expects a risk-free plan. Angels and VCs know start-ups are incredibly risky. If they don't, don't take their money--they don't know what they're doing! Most projects fail for reasons that could have been (and sometimes were) predicted far in advance. Since entrepreneurs are optimistic folks by nature: They tend to brush off predictions of doom and charge ahead assuming they will find a way to overcome. You can often avoid the most dire scenarios with intelligent upfront risk planning.

The risk analysis in your plan is to show that you've thought through risks, that you know how to plan for probable risks, and that your plan can survive when things go wrong.

Thumbs Up and shared! thanks a lot for sharing.

Best practices are commonly

On February 6th, 2012 kyle thomas glasser (not verified) said:

Best practices are commonly shared by companies. They are so open about this. There's no harm in trying the tested formula. It just needs to have a little bit of our imagination so as to make it our own. - Kyle Thomas Glasser