Compensation Challenges in 2012: Finding the Right Mix

January 12, 2012

by Joanne Sammer

Most companies know what they want to achieve with their compensation programs. They want to build, motivate and retain a strong, innovative and productive workforce. The question is, what mix of pay will help the company to achieve that goal?

This question is not a new one. Companies have always struggled to hit the sweet spot when it comes to employee pay. They want to dedicate enough money to motivate desired results without paying too much or, worse, motivating the wrong results.

However, as companies move away from the economic turmoil of the last few years and further into a recovering economy, they need to refocus on their compensation choices and mix. Moreover, CFOs need to consider how employees view the company's overall value proposition—that is, everything of value the company provides to employees, including nonfinancial rewards.

Differentiate

Not all companies are willing or able to increase their salary and incentive budgets, so they need to make sure they allocate those rewards in ways that clearly differentiate among all levels of performance. Even those companies that can increase salary and incentive budgets should emphasize this type of differentiation.

Jason Adwin of Sibson Consulting Group advises companies with limited budgets to provide salary increases only for employees in critical jobs, the highest performers, or any other important employee segment. Another option is to carve out a portion of the salary and incentive budget and allocate that amount specifically to the company's highest performers. "This ensures a premium investment is made in those few employees who truly create value," says Adwin. See more of Adwin's thoughts here.

If taking this approach creates a gap between rewards for high performers and lower performers, your company would not be alone. In its own predictions for 2012 compensation practices, consulting firm Mercer expects the growing rewards gap between high- and low-performing employees to continue. In fact, Mercer recommends that companies consider implementing "a segmented rewards strategy by identifying employee performance drivers across job families, job levels, business units, geographies and performance groups to determine where to place limited compensation dollars."

Recognize that things can change.

If companies learned one thing from the downturn, it is that budgets, particularly salary budgets, are not set in stone. Although the U.S. economy looks to be on the road to recovery, any number of developments and events could derail those gains. When things turned sour in 2008 and 2009, companies slashed their salary and incentive budgets. Should the economy take a wrong turn going forward, the salary and incentive budget could once again be on the chopping block.

If this turns out to be necessary, CFOs must work carefully with HR to ensure that employees understand the reasons for the cuts and what needs to happen for things to return to normal. Employees have already suffered through a major recession and tended to stay put because of a poor job market. However, they may not be so patient to wait out another downturn, particularly those who are your best and brightest.

Next time, we will look more closely at the employee value proposition and its role in motivating employees.

Average: 4.5 (2 votes)

Really your post is really

Really your post is really very good and I appreciate it. It’s hard to sort the good from the bad sometimes, but I think you’ve nailed it. You write very well which is amazing. I really impressed by your post.
Flowers

want to build, motivate and

want to build, motivate and retain a strong, innovative and productive workforce. The question is, what mix of pay will help the company to achieve that goal?

This is highly informative,

This is highly informative, crisp and clear. I think that everything has been described in systematic manner so that reader can get maximum information and learn many things.
pikalaina

Thank you for the article!

Coming from the UK I don't believe that any sort of these types of programmes exist, if they do I don't think they even go into as much details as what you are discussing here....

What I do like is the fact you highlight "Recognise that things can change" lots of businesses today are not flexible and do not understand this.. Which makes change hard...

Good job Joanne

I second the idea of paying

I second the idea of paying extra to high performers. It could be paid as performance bonus or as increase in salary. Unless employees are given incentive to work hard, they are not going to.

Nice

I truly wanted to construct a quick word in order to express gratitude to you for those amazing secrets you are placing on this site. My considerable internet search has at the end been honored with professional strategies to exchange with my two friends. I would repeat that most of us site visitors are undoubtedly endowed to live in a wonderful community with many awesome professionals with interesting methods. I feel very lucky to have seen your webpages and look forward to so many more brilliant minutes reading here. Thank you once again for all the details.

Compensation Challenges in 2012: Finding the Right Mix

The incentive budget for the employees is a very nice idea. :)

I agree!

I absolutely love reading this article, the manner of writing is outstanding.This post as usual was instructive, I have had to bookmark your website and subscribe to this feed in googlereader. this site looks impressive.

I admire your efforts and

I admire your efforts and your idea that you put into this blog. Thanks for the information. Really lovely and useful for me and will refer my friends to this blog.
Sensorineural Hearing Loss

good

The incentive budget for the employees is a very nice idea YES YES YES :-)

Compensation Challenges in 2012

The comp gap between high performers and medium-level performers is widening. This Chief Executive magazine article describes what's happening: http://chiefexecutive.net/how-to-reward-top-performers

Compensation challenges

Personally I have always found it amazing how some companies offer benefits before paying a living wage. If you don't pay enough to live reasonably comfortably on, at least give people cash so they can choose to spend it on their most critical needs.

salaries

I think that certainly the strength of a company are its employees. To improve their executive's definitely serves a greater motivation for employees and premiums even with a salary increase. However, I think that should be rewarded only those who really brings added value to the company and against penalized if there are people who are at work just to warm the chair!

Are you really sure this is

Are you really sure this is the only way to find a right mix? Thanks a lot.